#devops John willis devops

[devopstrainingtipsantrick]

What are the 5 ways of DevOps?

The "Five Ways of DevOps" is a concept popularized by Gene Kim in his book "The Phoenix Project" and expanded upon in "The DevOps Handbook" (co-authored by Gene Kim, Jez Humble, Patrick Debois, and John Willis). These five ways represent key principles and practices that organizations can follow to successfully implement DevOps principles. They are often referred to as the "Five Pillars of DevOps" or simply the "Five Ways." Here they are:

Flow: The first way focuses on improving the flow of work through the entire software delivery pipeline. This means ensuring that work moves smoothly and efficiently from development through testing, deployment, and into production. It involves reducing bottlenecks, minimizing handoffs, and automating manual processes. The goal is to accelerate the delivery of value to customers.

Feedback: The second way emphasizes the importance of feedback loops at all stages of the development and delivery process. Feedback helps identify problems early, enabling quick resolution. This includes feedback from automated tests, monitoring systems, user feedback, and retrospectives. Continuous feedback is essential for continuous improvement.

Continuous Delivery: The third way is about achieving continuous delivery, which means that any code change that passes automated tests can be deployed to production at any time. This involves automation of the deployment pipeline, including testing, integration, and deployment. Continuous delivery reduces the lead time for changes and enables rapid, reliable releases.

Leadership and Culture: The fourth way highlights the significance of creating a culture of trust, collaboration, and shared responsibility. It involves leadership that supports and encourages DevOps practices. This cultural shift includes breaking down silos between development and operations teams, fostering a culture of experimentation and learning, and promoting a sense of ownership among team members.

Automation: The fifth way emphasizes the importance of automation throughout the software delivery process. Automation helps reduce manual errors, increases consistency, and accelerates processes. It encompasses automation of infrastructure provisioning (Infrastructure as Code), testing, deployments, and monitoring. Automation is a key enabler for achieving the other four ways.

These five ways of DevOps provide a framework for organizations to assess and improve their DevOps practices. By focusing on flow, feedback, continuous delivery, leadership and culture, and automation, organizations can create a more efficient and effective software development and delivery pipeline, resulting in faster, more reliable releases and improved customer satisfaction.

[techrobot1235]

Top Trends and Future Scopes of DevOps

What is DevOps?

Organizations can build, deploy, and maintain applications and services with the aid of DevOps. It integrates development and operations.Patrick Dubois coined the term “New DevOps” in 2009. Utilizing the model’s compelling use cases will determine the future reach of DevOps. DevOps has a bright future as the best method for combining operations and development.

The phrase “DevOps” wasn’t first used until a conference in San Francisco in 2010, when Patrick Dubois and John Willis discussed the most effective ways to use automation tools when deploying code updates to live production systems.

Future Trends That Will Affect DevOps

DevOps unites developers and operations to accelerate deployment. DevOps does more than just speed up code deployment—it also improves code quality by cutting down on bugs and giving customers more useful features. Over the past decade, DevOps has also changed as a whole. In the modern era, it involves more than just having developers create scripts for their processes or automate repetitive tasks. It’s important to have a culture, and an understanding of how implementing DevOps practices can benefit the company.

 So let’s examine future trends that will impact DevOps:

Microservices architecture: Apps are divided into smaller units (microservices) that can be created and deployed separately in this type of architecture. With this strategy, businesses can quickly adapt to shifting market conditions by expanding their operations or adding new features without hurting the application as a whole.

Cloud-native technology: This technology uses containers, immutable infrastructure, and microservices to create a new approach to software design and deployment. For DevOps professionals, this innovative approach has many advantages. As a result of having less reliance on a single application or service, they can iterate more quickly. Using the immutable infrastructure also enables developers to deploy changes without interfering with production services.

Automation and CI/CD: IT operations and software development combine to create more reliable, effective, and efficient systems. The rules emphasize cooperation between IT operations and software developers to enhance workflow. Organizations will automate their testing and deployment procedures as they progress toward automating their infrastructure. They won’t have to spend as much time on manual labor and can stay updated with technology.

Less-code apps: They can be modified using drag-and-drop features. This trend will assist businesses in automating business procedures and accelerating delivery. By doing away with the need for onsite maintenance and custom development, this trend will also assist businesses in lowering their IT expenses. It offers a scalable solution for handling workflow and business process changes, which are frequently difficult for many organizations.

Integration of Kubernetes with DevOps: It has become even easier for businesses to integrate Kubernetes with DevOps due to its emergence as a top container orchestration engine. Since Kubernetes provides a flexible platform for application deployment in any environment with any infrastructure or cloud provider, businesses from all sectors have quickly adopted it.

Scope of DevOps in Various Industries

These are the industries where DevOps will have potential in the future:

IT industry

DevOps simplifies processes and makes it easier for developers to introduce new features. The future of DevOps in the IT sector is promising. Employing DevOps specialists is becoming more essential for businesses as it gains popularity.DevOps specialists manage the entire process from development to deployment. They must have a thorough understanding of both the technical and non-technical facets of software development.

Telecommunication

Software engineering and operations engineering techniques are used in the DevOps methodology. It develops products with the highest quality, stability, and security.

Medical Care

DevOps helps bridge the gap between development and operations, often used by businesses for software-based products, but also in other fields like healthcare.

Hospitality

One of the global industries that is evolving the fastest is this one. Technology has made it simpler for hotels to offer better service to their customers and improve the quality of their lives. Even now, some hotels use artificial intelligence (AI) to improve processes like room service and save time and money.

Conclusion

DevOps will help to improve the business’s capacity to produce, introduce, and maintain high-quality software solutions. It will assist organizations in quick automation and focus on continually enhancing results. The development, IT, and business teams communicate effectively due to these trends.

[devopsengineer]

John willis devops

John willis devops John willis devops New John willis devops Introduction to DevSecOps by John Willis (Red Hat) – OpenShift Commons Briefing December 12, 2019 | by Diane Mueller In this briefing, DevSecOps expert, John Willis, Senior Director, Global Transformation Office at Red Hat gives an introduction to DevSecOps and a brief history of the origins of the topics. Why traditional DevOps has…

[rishabhpandey9]

What are the best resources for learning about DevOps?

There are many resources available online for learning about DevOps, including books, blogs, tutorials, and online courses. Here are a few resources that are highly recommended for learning about DevOps:

The Phoenix Project: A Novel About IT, DevOps, and Helping Your Business Win by Gene Kim, Kevin Behr, and George Spafford - This book provides a fictional account of a company's journey to implementing DevOps, along with real-world examples and practical advice.

The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations by Gene Kim, Patrick Debois, John Willis, and Jez Humble - This book is a comprehensive guide to DevOps, covering the principles, practices, and tools needed to create a high-performing DevOps organization.

DevOps.com - This website is a leading resource for DevOps news, articles, and best practices. It features a community of experts and provides a wealth of information on all aspects of DevOps.

Docker and Kubernetes tutorials - Docker and Kubernetes are two essential tools used in DevOps, and there are many free online tutorials available for learning how to use them.

Udemy - Udemy offers a range of DevOps courses taught by industry experts, with topics ranging from introduction to DevOps to advanced topics such as Docker and Kubernetes.

AWS DevOps blog - Amazon Web Services (AWS) provides a blog dedicated to DevOps, featuring articles and tutorials on various topics related to DevOps on the AWS platform.

DevOps Institute - This is a global professional association for DevOps professionals, providing resources such as certification programs, training courses, and events.

These are just a few examples of the many resources available for learning about DevOps. It's important to research and find the resources that best suit your learning style and needs.

[trevmex]

#DevOpsDays Seattle Day 2 Talk 4

John Willis - Devops' Seven Deadly Diseases @botchagalupe

 You can't Lean, Agile, SAFE, or DevOps your way around a bad organizational culture.

 If you want to transform a large corporation, you have to deal with a lot of organizational scar tissue. If you don't include the people you are asking to change in the change, it is dead-on-arrival. This is entirely a human problem, not a technology problem.

 Organizational Forensics - walking into an organization, and understanding what the future state of your legacy company can get to. Talk to the developers, talk to the operators, do not talk to the managers. Do not talk to the senior leadership. The boots on the ground will tell you the real truth.

 What are the five things your corporation is not doing that you should be doing. The frequent top ones are: communication, capacity, direction, etc.

 Read "The Reengineering Alternative" by William Schneider

 The hardest thing to get is high cultivation in your organization.

 Sin #1: Measuring and Managing Work (Make Work Visible): Invisible work KILLS business. You wouldn't tolerate this in ANY other part of the business. Imagine not knowing what people are working on in Finance (oh no!).

 Where does work start? Why are you taking work from people and not documenting it?

 Confirmation bias is big in DevOps, we tend to only talk people that "get" us. Well, DevOps is needed in ALL industries, especially in ones that don't know they need it.

 Dark debt is the tech debt we build but do not understand.

 We do not collect data on queue times for tech work.

 Sin #2: Multiple work systems: Ticketing systems, JIRA, service catalogs, etc. We have too many work systems. We want to get down to ONE work system.

 Sin #3: Misalignment of incentives: If you are product-focused, you get better teams. If you are project-focused, people have less direction.

 Sin #4: Institutional vs Tribal Knowledge: We waste so much time by not writing things down. The truest bottleneck is the one you don't know.

 Learn "Wardley Mappings."

 Sin #5: Organizational Design: "I" vs "T" vs "E" Shaped people. The more our people know about diverse things the better we are as an organization.

 Sin #6: Manage Complexity: Blame Culture: Root Cause thinking is bad. Check out the "Abraham Wald" story. We need to understand WHY people that know things know them. Identify the people that know how to get things done.

 Sin #7: DevSecOps: You got to move security to the left. Move from subjective compliance to objective compliance.

 Thanks John for the great talk.

[chithamparam]

Puppet DevOps

                       Puppet DevOps

What is DevOps?

We've seen an immense blast of interest in DevOps throughout recent years. Yet, for individuals who are new to these thoughts, it's not generally clear what DevOps really involves and what the advantages are, especially in bigger conditions. Furthermore, considering that DevOps got going as a grassroots development and keeps on being intensely impacted by professionals, it could be even less obvious to ranking directors what's really going on with it.

I truly believe it's certain that we haven't wound up with a rigorously characterized meaning of doing "DevOps." This has permitted the development to develop and answer the changing scene of foundation choices without being too limited by a conclusive declaration that might have in practically no time become old.

I will take an early essential meaning of DevOps created by John Willis and Damon Edwards, alongside the Three Different ways that Quality Kim distinguished, and utilize these as models to assist you with understanding what's really going on with Devops.

On the whole, how about we set the stage by taking a gander at why DevOps matters by any means, and a portion of the scene changes that have empowered DevOps.

A context for DevOps:

Today, every association relies upon programming. Retail, operations, government, logical exploration, tech, instruction, monetary administrations — each area needs some kind of programming to meet client and client needs. The assumptions individuals have of programming have changed emphatically throughout the past ten years: They expect solid and advantageous administrations that are routinely gotten to the next level. The intricacy of our registering foundation increments persistently, as does the strain to convey more programming, all the more regularly, and at better expectations of value.

The typical approach to conveying programming in associations has been unimaginably broken, on the grounds that motivators simply haven't been adjusted. Time after time, engineers are boosted exclusively to convey new elements; their obligation closes when the product is given to the activities groups to send. Activities groups have been boosted to keep foundation as steady as could really be expected; their obligation regarding programming conveyance begins just whenever they've been given the product to send. (Also, obviously, tasks ordinarily has a lot of liabilities as well as conveying programming, including overseeing costs, client records and by and large limit, in addition to guaranteeing in general security.)

The motivators of these two gatherings are generally against. We can't fix what is going on with innovative practices alone.

On the off chance that we as a whole perceive how broken this present circumstance is, the reason did it take this long for us to sort out an assortment of practices to fix it? I see two primary patterns that drove us to DevOps.

APIs:

As of late, we began improving and more straightforward APIs around framework the executives. Having the option to summon APIs to take care of business like provisioning virtual machines and cloud occurrences, alongside the ascent of framework as-code programming like Manikin, implied that we could begin really dealing with our foundation like programming. This thus implied we could exploit all that we've learnt in the programming field over the most recent few decades — for instance, the worth of rendition control, fanning methodologies, and code survey. Expanding predominance of less complex and simpler to-utilize APIs (like the far and wide reception of Peaceful APIs) made it more straightforward for non-designers to utilize them, which brought about a more extensive gathering inside the tasks field having the option to do improvement instead of prearranging. This pushed more activities individuals into learning essential computer programming rehearses.

Agile:

Second, we had an overall acknowledgment that deft programming improvement was a superior approach to working, bringing about greater programming that could be conveyed all the more rapidly. The Manikin and more extensive DevOps people group began creating more reusable substance they could share, which normally began uncovering increasingly more sysadmins to current reasoning around programming improvement rehearses. The developing notoriety of dexterous approaches brought about additional deliveries, coming down in activities groups, and making it more dire to further develop how they oversaw framework.

[scottmodman]

John Willis talks the next frontier in...

John Willis talks the next frontier in...

Thanks for stopping by. We are still remote, still very much in lockdown. But the silver lining is that we have been fortunate to reach some really influential people in the DevOps world. In this episode, we sit down to chat with John Willis, Red Hat, and Rosalind Rad

IBM Get Social Hub

[brieflymagicalcolor]

John Willis talks the next frontier in...

John Willis talks the next frontier in...

Thanks for stopping by. We are still remote, still very much in lockdown. But the silver lining is that we have been fortunate to reach some really influential people in the DevOps world. In this episode, we sit down to chat with John Willis, Red Hat, and Rosalind Rad

IBM Get Social Hub

[sanyamalhotra24]

DevOps + Security= DevSecOps

Here are the top 4 key elements introduced by Damon Edwards and John Willis (DevOps Experts at DevOps Cafe) to integrate security into DevOps-

1. Culture

2. Automation 

3. Measurement

4. Sharing 

[releaseteam]

"DevOps = CALMS. Culture. Automation. Lean. Measurement. Sharing" ~ John Willis, Damon Edwards, and Jez Humble https://t.co/cGoOk8wRcc

— Nishan R. Wijesinghe (@NishanRw) June 7, 2020

via: https://ift.tt/1GAs5mb

[devopstrainingtutorial]

Devops Training

Rainbow Training Institute provides the best DevOps training. Enroll for DevOps training in Hyderabad certification, delivered by Certified DevOps Experts. Here we are offering DevOps training across global.

DevOps is a culture which advances joint effort among Development and Operations Team to send code to creation quicker in a robotized and repeatable manner. The word 'DevOps' is a mix of two words 'advancement' and 'tasks.'

Continuous Integration

Continuous Integration (CI) is an improvement practice that expects designers to coordinate code into a mutual vault a few times each day. Each registration is then checked by a robotized fabricate, permitting groups to identify issues early. By incorporating consistently, you can identify blunders rapidly, and find them all the more effectively.

With CI, a designer works on coordinating the code changes persistently with the remainder of the group. The combination occurs after a "git push," typically to an ace branch—more on this later. At that point, in a committed server, a robotized procedure fabricates the application and runs a lot of tests to affirm that the most up to date code coordinates with what's as of now in the ace branch.

In case you're doing CI and for reasons unknown the incorporation falls flat, that implies the wrecked form turns into the most elevated need to fix before proceeding to include more highlights. Framework quality—not simply speed—is significant. CI works in three basic stages: push, test, and fix. However, in spite of this straightforwardness, CI may become testing if just a couple of individuals from the group practice it. Therefore, CI additionally requires an adjustment in culture and backing from the board.

Push to ace each day

Of all the three phases of CI, resolving to ace is the most straightforward in fact, yet the hardest socially. What's more, the explanation that is genuine is that coordinating code every day doesn't imply that a designer will drive the code into an element branch. No, the CI practice is tied in with driving code into the ace branch, since that is the branch that will be utilized to discharge programming. The "push to ace" arrange is otherwise called trunk-based advancement, and there's a devoted site that clarifies this system in substantially more detail.

At the point when you practice CI, it doesn't mean you'll never again use branches. You despite everything will. The main contrast is that since you intensify input when you incorporate code constantly, branches become impermanent. A branch may live just for the afternoon; at that point it's coordinated into the ace branch.

In any case, shouldn't something be said about fragmented changes? All things considered, you can coordinate inadequate changes by utilizing highlight banners.

Highlight banners are an if condition deciding if to run the new code or not. On the off chance that a change isn't finished at this point, the banner is off as a matter of course. That way, when you coordinate the code, the remainder of the group gets an opportunity to survey it. A similar strategy applies if the new code has bugs.

Depend on computerized solid tests

To approve each time a designer incorporates new code, CI depends on a computerized and solid suite of tests. On the off chance that you have to accumulate the code, the main test is that the code incorporates. At that point, you can incorporate the same number of tests as you think about basic.

What number of tests ought to be incorporated? To discover that, recollect that CI's motivation is to give criticism as quickly as time permits. In the event that an engineer needs to hold up an hour to get criticism, it won't work. An engineer will like to stand by instead of push, and the push may happen one more day. Furthermore, if the construct takes excessively long, it'll require the group to facilitate who can push. See what I mean? That is the reason the group may want to return and utilize long component branches. Keep the CI circle as short as could reasonably be expected. You may need to lean vigorously on unit testing and softly on incorporation testing.

In conclusion, the suite of tests ought to have the option to state that something is broken; tests ought to be solid. You're continually going to miss things. In any case, when you recognize a bug underway, make an experiment and remember it for the CI circle. You can undoubtedly affirm that it's dependable: If the banner for the bug fix is off and the fabricate breaks; if the banner for the bug fix is on, the assemble works.

Organize fixing a wrecked form

At the point when the fabricate is broken, fixing it ought to be the need for the group. Furthermore, the significance of fixing it ought to be a mutual outlook in the way of life.

Fixing the work, as a standard, originates from the Toyota andon rope that the vehicle maker used to deliver autos. John Willis composed a post regarding the matter, and in it, he depicts Toyota's procedure like this:

Toyota actualized the Andon Cord as a physical rope that followed the mechanical production system and could be pulled to stop the assembling line whenever. Besides, this wasn't a request that consent stop the line. The force really halted the line.

In programming, the likeness a Toyota andon line is that each time a form is broken, nobody else can keep pushing code changes.

In opposition to what you may think, at Toyota, the andon line is pulled quite often. Everybody in the group knows about the issues occurring. Moreover, whoever breaks the manufacture will attempt to fix the issue, and on the off chance that help is required, at that point the remainder of the group is there. In programming, if the construct can't be fixed inside minutes, the group ought to choose in the event that they'll evacuate the code or turn the component banner off. Having a "green" form isn't one individual's concern any longer. It ought to be a need, similar to it is at Toyota.

The thought behind fixing a messed up manufacture is that the assemble is continually going to deliver working code that is alright to discharge.

Apparatuses for CI

CI is essentially a social move, yet a few devices could assist you with getting the activity done rapidly. Also, you can even beginning on a dollar daily, as per James Shore. All you need is an old PC, an elastic chicken (truly!), and a work area chime. Shore's post is humorous, and I suggest you read it. He makes an admirable statement understood: absence of devices isn't a reason. You can do CI without them.

In any case, instruments can help. Here's a rundown of basic devices that you can begin utilizing today.

Jenkins—a free, open-source, Java-based instrument that gives you a great deal of adaptability.

Sky blue Pipelines—a Microsoft item free for up to five clients and open-source ventures.

Cloud Build—the oversaw administration offering from Google Cloud Platform.

Travis CI—a mainstream apparatus for GitHub open-source extends that offers a facilitated or self-facilitated arrangement.

GitLab CI—a free instrument from GitLab that can likewise coordinate with different devices by means of the API.

CircleCI—a device that is mainstream for GitHub extends and has a facilitated and self-facilitated arrangement. You can begin for nothing.

CodeShip—a self-facilitated just arrangement. You can begin with the free form, however it's a paid apparatus.

There are more CI devices, however I needed to keep the rundown short with the apparatuses I've by and by utilized. It's difficult to characterize my preferred device, however right now I'd state that it's Azure Pipelines. With it, you can incorporate a ton of devices. In addition, it's anything but difficult to utilize, and you can characterize pipelines as code.

[devopsengineer]

John willis devops

John willis devops John willis devops World news John willis devops one man’s singularity This episode of DevOps Shorts is probably the most exciting one I’ve recorded until now! This time I was honoured to host none other but the great John Willis himself – the man who brought DevOpsDays to US, the originator of the CA(L)MS acronym, one of the authors of “The DevOps Handbook” and now – a…

[lnetm]

April LNETM (Cyber Insecurity..?)

Monday 29th April (6:30pm - 9:00pm)

Sign-up here.

Feeling insecure...? 

There has been unprecedented demand for IT Security solutions in recent years, with everyone from third party suppliers to the CEO being focused on and caught out by cyber risks.

The market for IT Security products has also been growing along with this demand, with companies increasing in both size and number – Gartner estimates the overall size of this market at $124 Billion in 2019, with a significant portion of this capital seemingly spent on feeding fear uncertainty and doubt in customers.

But when it comes down to it, what are the real threats and are we taking the right approach to mitigate them? Is the business of IT Security getting too big? Is this highly fragmented industry creating needs where there are none? Are there too many security companies? What should we care about?

We have a world class panel to discuss these questions and many more IT Security related topics, including:

Dexter Casey (CISO of Centrica)

Siân John (EMEA Chief Security Advisor, Cybersecurity Solutions Group at Microsoft)

Julian Levy (Operating Partner at Redline Capital) - Moderator

Becky Pinkard (VP, IT & Intelligence at Digital Shadows)

Will Sheldon (Investor at Summit Partners)

In addition, there will be demo presentations from two highly innovative emerging IT Security companies:

BigID uses advanced machine learning and identity intelligence to help enterprises better protect their customer and employee data at petabyte scale. Using BigID, enterprises can better safeguard and assure the privacy of their most sensitive data, reducing breach risk and enabling compliance with emerging data protection regulations like the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation and California Consumer Privacy Act.

Blackout Technologies offers employers total control over that which employees can access via their mobile devices, including the ability to disable the camera and browser functions, and block the launching of apps on iOS and Android. This drastically limits the amount of data that could be removed or sent by rogue employees.

Sevren is a next generation application security management & orchestration platform tailored towards the emerging DevOps environment. Sevren programmatically consolidates all available development-environment data and uses this to provide visibility-into and automatic orchestration-of the SecDLC with a next generation ‘policy-as-code' solution.

Dexter Casey (Group CISO of Centrica)

Dexter Casey is the Group CISO of Centrica PLC, the UK's largest energy & gas company. Dexter has 17 years experience in the IT Security space, with senior roles at a range of top tier organisations including Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, HSBC, Willis Towers Watson, Royal Mail Group and The Cooperative Group.

Siân John (EMEA Chief Security Advisor, Cybersecurity Solutions Group at Microsoft)

Siân John MBE is Chief Security Advisor for EMEA in the Cybersecurity Solutions Group at Microsoft. Siân has worked in cyber security since 1997, and has worked at the Houses of Parliament, Ubizen and Symantec before joining Microsoft.

Siân leads the EMEA security advisors who work with Microsoft’s customers to help them to develop their cyber security strategy, security best practices and to understand how Microsoft’s technology and services can help support digital transformation and cloud services. Siân directly engages with Microsoft’s largest customers in the UK and Ireland.

She was awarded an MBE in the Queens New Years Honours List for 2018 for services to Cybersecurity. She holds the CiSSP, CISM, and SABSA certifications. Siân is Chair of both the techUK CyberSecurity Management committee and the Digital Economy Advisory Board for the UK Research Councils.

Julian Levy (Operating Partner at Redline Capital) - Moderator

Julian Levy is the Operating Partner at Redline Capital, a 350M B2B technology fund, where he focuses on anything to do with enterprise technology with specific interests around security, silicon and infrastructure.

Prior to his career in venture capital, Julian had worked for a CSFB, BofA Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley, covering a broad range of technical and commercial roles including leading global technology teams, working in security engineering and infrastructure roles, front-office equity research and business development, as well as having been an Entrepreneur-In-Residence at Index Ventures, and founded his own company.

Becky Pinkard (VP, IT & Intelligence at Digital Shadows)

Becky Pinkard, VP, IT and Intelligence at Digital Shadows, is a renowned practitioner and commentator on the information security sector who has been working in information technology and security since 1996.

A security transformation expert, Becky has built and managed global information security teams, designed risk and compliance strategies, led security audits and assessments, and developed security awareness training in small and large environments. She began her current role with Digital Shadows in December 2015.

Becky was a SANS Institute certified instructor for over a decade, beginning her training career with SANS in 2001. She has also served as a GIAC Certified Intrusion Analyst advisory board member and on the Strategic Advisory Council for the Center for Internet Security. Becky has co-authored "Nmap in the Enterprise" and "Intrusion Prevention and Active Response, Deploying Network and Host IPS".

Will Sheldon (Investor at Summit Partners)

Will Sheldon is a technology investor at Summit Partners, where he helps to lead European software and IT security investments. Summit Partners’ security software investments include Avast (IPO), Cloudmark (acquired by Proofpoint), Darktrace, LiveOffice (acquired by Symantec), McAfee (IPO), NetWitness (acquired by RSA), Postini (acquired by Google), RiskIQ, SafeBoot (acquired by McAfee), and Sybari (acquired by Microsoft). Founded in 1984, Summit Partners is currently managing more than $19 billion, with offices in Boston, Menlo Park, London and Luxembourg.

Aside from his role at Summit Partners, Will is a member of the Steering Committee of SINET, a global cybersecurity community supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security with the mission to encourage innovation within the security domain. Will also serves as a mentor at CyLon, a leading accelerator program for IT security start-ups.

[itunesbooks]

The DevOps Handbook: - Gene Kim, Jez Humble, Patrick Debois & John Willis

The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations Gene Kim, Jez Humble, Patrick Debois & John Willis Genre: Management & Leadership Price: $24.99 Publish Date: October 6, 2016 Publisher: IT Revolution Press Seller: National Book Network Increase profitability, elevate work culture, and exceed productivity goals through DevOps practices. More than ever, the effective management of technology is critical for business competitiveness. For decades, technology leaders have struggled to balance agility, reliability, and security. The consequences of failure have never been greater―whether it's the healthcare.gov debacle, cardholder data breaches, or missing the boat with Big Data in the cloud. And yet, high performers using DevOps principles, such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, Etsy, and Netflix, are routinely and reliably deploying code into production hundreds, or even thousands, of times per day. Following in the footsteps of The Phoenix Project, The DevOps Handbook shows leaders how to replicate these incredible outcomes, by showing how to integrate Product Management, Development, QA, IT Operations, and Information Security to elevate your company and win in the marketplace. http://dlvr.it/R1RgMZ

[theagileadmin]

Want to be part of the DevSecOps Handbook?

Want to be part of the DevSecOps Handbook?

The word is out, at RSA this week Shannon Lietz (@devsecops), James Wickett (@wickett), John Willis (@botchagalupe), and myself (Ernest Mueller, @ernestmueller) did a panel on our upcoming book, the DevSecOps Handbook.  We’re still writing it, and we want to make you a part of it!

Like the DevOps Handbook, also from IT Revolution Press, the heart of the book is case studies from practitioners…

[qwertsypage]

DevOps influencers to follow this year

Every subject has experts and influencers. People who inspire us and motivate us. Today, let’s talk about DevOps. Even Though you may find thousands of influencers on the internet, it is hard to know who is truly worth following. So, our DevOps team came up with the list of top 22 DevOps influencers we believe make a difference in software development industry.

  DevOps influencers

  1. Martin Fowler The first one on our list of DevOps influencers is Martin Fowler. He is a prolific writer and DevOps influencer. He’s authored no less than seven books about software development and has been a columnist for a number of software publications. You can find a lot of useful information about DevOps and related technology topics in his Twitter account.

  2. Bridget Kromhout 

Bridget is a principal cloud developer advocate at Microsoft. She gives podcasts about DevOps and organized DevOpsDays.

  3. John Arundel John is a consultant and helps companies with Devops, Puppet, Docker, Kubernetes, etc. He is an expert in automation.

  4. Gene Kim Gene is a DevOps enthusiast, The Phoenix Project and DevOps Handbook co-author, author of many books related to DevOps area.

  5. Jez Humble Jez is a co-author of Continuous Delivery, Lean Enterprise and DevOps Handbook. CTO at Devops-research.com and twitter activist. There you will find useful DevOps information on a daily basis.

  6. Dave Farley Dave is very active on Twitter. If you are interested in finding daily DevOps source of information, Dave’s Twitter is for you.

  7. Gareth Rushgrove This software developer and sysadmin is always in the know when it comes to DevOps news. As the curator of DevOps Weekly, which you should read, Gareths feed is DevOps heaven. Follow him on Twitter to stay up to date with the DevOps evolving world.

  8. DevOps Reactions Whether you are having a rough Monday or your tests keep failing, DevOps Reactions is a great way to put a smile on your face. In this account you will find relevant highlights, that show that these guys know what they are talking about.

  9. Martin Logan Martin is a DevOps influencer – one of the originals in fact. Martin Logan is one of the founding members of DevOps.com. He write books, gives presentations and talks. His Twitter account is definitely worth following.

  10. JP Morgenthal JP Morgenthal is an author and a DevOps blogger. He also advises C-suite executives on value-adding technology strategies. You’ll find most of his DevOps posts on the blog at DevOps.com, on his personal website, The Tech Evangelist and his Twitter account.

  11. Jason Cox Jason Cox is Director of Systems Engineering at the Walt Disney Company. He’s a keen DevOps enthusiast and speaks on behalf of the movement at national conferences.

  12. Apiumhub

Apiumhub has a team of DevOps experts who regularly write articles about Docker, Continuous Integration, DevOps projects, etc. 

  13. Helen Beal Helen works as the head of DevOps practice at Ranger4, an organization that helps companies adopt and embrace a DevOps culture. In the true spirit of an evangelist who can listen as well as talk, Helen has a series of posts over at the Ranger4 blog, in which she features the views and opinions of experts in development, IT asset management, and IT operations.

  14. Chris Corriere Chris Corriere is a DevOps Engineer at Autotrader, he contributes to the DevOps.com blog on a regular basis. And tweets on a regular basis.

  15.  Andrew Storms Andrew is a contributor to DevOps.com, also he is a notable authority on IT security. He is active on Twitter, where he shares his own opinions, thoughts and discoveries. 

  16.  Elisabeth Hendrickson Elisabeth Hendrickson spends her time embroiled in the DevOps culture at Pivotal, where she is the VP of Engineering. Elisabeth is also an author and inexhaustible testing protagonist. Elisabeth does tweet regularly and often speaks at events about DevOps, automation and Agile development practice.

  17. Gareth Rushgrove Gareth Rushgrove is a software and operations engineer. He speaks, tweets, and blogs about DevOps topics and has been particularly forthcoming in sharing his experiences helping the British government’s digital service to get established.

  18. Marten Mickos Marten Mickos has plenty of experience on which to draw when sharing his views and thoughts about DevOps, leadership, cloud computing, and open source technology. Today, Marten is the Senior VP of the cloud business at Hewlett-Packard.

  19. Stephen Nelson-Smith Stephen is another DevOps veteran, having been there right at the beginning of the movement. Stephen shares his knowledge and expertise through keynote talks and is also an author. He has Twitter account, where he shares useful DevOps information on a regular basis.

  20. Julian Simpson Julian Simpson offers plenty of DevOps wisdom in 140 words or less. If you want to check his output, follow him on Twitter

  21. Damon Edwards Damon’s credentials as a DevOps expert are impeccable, his keynote talks are renowned and he contributes occasionally to the Dev2ops blog. One of Damon’s primary interests is in helping “Software as a Service” providers resolve their DevOps challenges.

  22. John Willis John Willis has earned a reputation for being “the voice” of DevOps, thanks to his frequent speaking appearances and his Co-hosting role on the DevOps Café Podcast. John also writes guest posts. These posts are always a stimulating read and clearly reveal his passion for what DevOps means and what he believes it should stand for. He is also active on Twitter.

  If you would like to know more about DevOps influencers, I highly recommend you to subscribe to our monthly newsletter by clicking here.  

  And if you found this article with DevOps influencers interesting, you might like…

  Scala generics I: Scala type bounds

Scala generics II: covariance and contravariance  

Scala generics III: Generalized type constraints

BDD: user interface testing

F-bound over a generic type in Scala

Microservices vs Monolithic architecture

“Almost-infinit” scalability

iOS Objective-C app: sucessful case study

Mobile app development trends of the year

Banco Falabella wearable case study 

Mobile development projects 

Viper architecture advantages for iOS apps 

Why Kotlin ? 

Software architecture meetups

Pure MVP in Android 

Be more functional in Java ith Vavr

 The post DevOps influencers to follow this year appeared first on Apiumhub.

DevOps influencers to follow this year published first on https://koresolpage.tumblr.com/